Archive for the ‘McCain 08’ Category

Winning The War (Not In Obama’s Gameplan)

July 30, 2008

The continued drive by many on the left and in the media to bring about an American retreat in Iraq has given rise to a whole gamut of emotions in me over the past few months, ranging from bewilderment and frustration to anger. The shortsightedness and lack of vision in people like Barack Obama and many in the media lead one to question their intelligence, their motives and their patriotism. Let us not forget, that the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq were not started on the whims of a war-president. America was forced into taking up the fight against Islamic extremism and those who sponsored world-wide terror by the acts of her enemies – a fight that the United States should have begun many years earlier.

It is refreshing to read journalists such as Christopher Hitchens continuing to provide an untainted, ‘un-anti-American” (clearly far removed from the daily offerings of many in the American media) view on the necessity of the war against Islamic extremism and the success of the troops.

Hitchens’ latest article, The War Between the Wars, at Slate.com argues that we should be fighting Islamic extremism wherever it is in the world and that America and its allies are capable of taking on its enemies at more that one place at a time. It is Hitchens at his best and I only hope McCain and his team can stick to their guns on this issue and remind the American public of the serious consequences of Obama’s plan to run with our tails between our legs.

I like Hitchens’ argument against Obama’s and the left in general that two wars (in Afghanistan and Iraq) cannot be fought at once… (I have put some choice words in bold)

“…any attempt to play off the two wars against each other is little more than a small-minded and zero-sum exercise. And consider the implications. Most people appear now to believe that it is quite wrong to mention Saddam Hussein even in the same breath as either a) weapons of mass destruction or b) state-sponsored terrorism. I happen to disagree, but just for an experiment, let us imagine that some regime did exist or did arise that posed such a combination of threats. (Actually, so feverish is my imagination that I can even think of one whose name also begins with I.) Would we be bound to say, in public and in advance, that the Western alliance couldn’t get around to confronting such a threat until it had Afghanistan well under control? This would be rather like the equivalent fallacy that nothing can be done in the region until there is a settlement of the Israel-Palestine dispute. Not only does this mean that every rogue in the region can reset his timeline until one of the world’s oldest and most intractable quarrels is settled, it also means that every rogue has an incentive to make certain that no such settlement can ever occur. (Which is, of course, why Saddam threw, and now the Iranians throw, their support to the suicide-murderers.)

Maybe Obama should take note of the following before he provides more comfort to our foes with his plans…

“If it is true, as yesterday’s three-decker front-page headline in the New York Times had it, that “U.S. Considering Stepping Up Pace of Iraq Pullout/ Fall in Violence Cited/ More Troops Could Be Freed for Operations in Afghanistan,” then this can only be because al-Qaida in Iraq has been subjected to a battlefield defeat at our hands—a military defeat accompanied by a political humiliation in which its fanatics have been angrily repudiated by the very people they falsely claimed to be fighting for. ”

If we had left Iraq according to the timetable of the anti-war movement, the situation would be the precise reverse: The Iraqi people would now be excruciatingly tyrannized by the gloating sadists of al-Qaida, who could further boast of having inflicted a battlefield defeat on the United States. I dare say the word of that would have spread to Afghanistan fast enough and, indeed, to other places where the enemy operates.”

Hitchens finishes his above-quoted conclusion with these words of warning for the left and Obama…

“Bear this in mind next time you hear any easy talk about “the hunt for the real enemy” or any loose babble that suggests that we can only confront our foes in one place at a time.”

Unfortunately, Obama and his fans fail to see the significance of this fight against Islamic extremism. The significance for the future of our civilisation. Obama sees the wars in Iraq and in Afghanistan as part of his political game. They are much more important than that.

McCain has always said he puts America first, before his own individual success. This has been clear from his outstanding career where integrity, honesty and loyalty were the foundation of his life. America has to remember this come election day.

Glib remarks from Obama that give his followers a superficial ‘warm fuzzy’ will come back haunt Americans should they choose to elect him – at no time will this be more haunting than when our troops are retreating and the enemy is celebrating on the streets of the cities in Iraq (assuming Obama sticks to his promise of surrendering in 16 months – he is already showing signs of the liberal flip-flop, so who knows?).

Advertisements

Olbermann’s Self-inflated Ego…

May 6, 2008

Keith Olbermann’s ego, which he personally inflates every night with the aid of the usual cronies of the liberal elite media, must surely be in danger of bursting. Once a minor satirist, now a self-promoting apologist for all things anti-American, Olbermann’s show has survived for tworeasons. Firstly, it is on a cable news network that few care to watch. Secondly, he’s taken the easy option of being a Bush-basher, an anti-war, anti-American, and anti-Western Civilisation ‘journalist’ – something that is guaranteed to gain him good press in the wishy-washy world of the liberal media.

Tonight, once again, he took the opportunity to attack Senator McCain. The criticisms of McCain were exaggerations of the facts at best, or childish lies at worst. His partner in crime this evening was a certain Matt Taibii, dubious author of a deeply troubling book that supports the anti-American conspiracy ideas behind 9/11 among other disturbing notions. They took it in turns to take swipes at McCain, to back each other up and to mock America. At one point, Olbermann made light of the “post-9/11” world – he is an offensive cretin if he does not believe most people’s lives in the western world were altered by 9/11. Our whole outlook on the world, our security, religious extremism had to change.

Olbermann and Taibii spoke in circles and contradictions; at one point, criticising McCain for changing his opinions, and then pseudo-praising him for not blindly sticking to certain conviction. One would hope a politician could modify his views on issues over the course of several decades – it would be very concerning if he held exactly the same views in 2008 as in 1988. The world is constantly changing.

Taibii guffawed when mentioning that McCain had voted against his own bills in the Senate. Neither he nor Olbermann bothered to mention that he voted against some of his own proposed bills owing to their final state and content when they were presented to senators for the vote.

I do not want to waste any more of your time with Olbermann quotations or comments. All I will add is the following… Olbermann has put his eggs in the Obama basket. Two peas in a pod… two leftist elitists, out of touch with the people and often offending middle America. Hopefully, 2008 will bring an end to their negative, anti-American tripe they both try to force down the throats of their audience.

McCain – Man of Compassion and Integrity

April 14, 2008

John McCain’s popularity across party lines has as much to do with his character as with his political views. The recent article, The Great John McCain Story You’ve Probably Forgotten by Michael Lewis at Slate.com, is a reminder of McCain’s genuine compassion for his fellow man regardless of party line.

Veterans For McCain

April 14, 2008

Despite the mainstream media’s attempts at painting a different picture, Mccain’s support among veterans remains strong.

The following site has some useful links and information about why veterans are backing McCain to be the next Commander-in-Chief… Mad Irish Man…

McCain on Tibet

March 20, 2008

It is encouraging to see John McCain releasing such a forceful statement on the atrocious actions of the Chinese government…

STATEMENT BY JOHN MCCAIN ON TIBET

For Immediate Release

Contact: Press Office

Tuesday, March 18, 2008

703-650-5550


ARLINGTON , VA — U.S. Senator John McCain today issued the following statement on the situation in Tibet :

“The unfolding tragedy in Tibet should draw the attention of the entire world.  I deplore the violent crackdown by Chinese authorities and the continuing oppression in Tibet of those merely wishing to practice their faith and preserve their culture and heritage.  I have listened carefully to the Dalai Lama and am convinced he is a man of peace who reflects the hopes and aspirations of Tibetans.  I urge the government of the People’s Republic of China to address the root causes of unrest in Tibet by opening a genuine dialogue with His Holiness, the Dalai Lama.  Reports of shutting down YouTube and confiscation of SIM cards are disturbing and reports of multiple deaths are far more so, especially in a year when China is preparing to host the Olympic Games.  I urge the Chinese authorities to ensure peaceful protest is not met with violence, to release monks and others detained for peacefully expressing their views and to allow full outside access to Tibet .”

Cheney: “So?” – Well said!

March 20, 2008

The media is up in arms at Vice-President Dick Cheney’s latest comments on the war in Iraq. The following dialogue took place during an interview with Martha Raddatz for ABC’s Good Morning America…

CHENEY: On the security front, I think there’s a general consensus that we’ve made major progress, that the surge has worked. That’s been a major success.

RADDATZ: Two-third of Americans say it’s not worth fighting.

CHENEY: So?

RADDATZ So? You don’t care what the American people think?

CHENEY: No. I think you cannot be blown off course by the fluctuations in the public opinion polls.

The grand hoohaa has been over his use of the word “so?” in the sense of ‘so what?’ I do not see what the problem is. Great leaders the world over are not fussed by the views of the general public which change with the wind. I find it interesting that the left side with opinion polls and demand that the President act in way that would court popularity with the masses on the issue of war. The public are not in a position to make decisions about wartime tactics and strategies, and yet the media and the Democrats attack Bush and Cheney for not kowtowing to the whims of the people.

That is not how democracy works. We elect politicians to make those decisions. The media seem to want this war on terror to be waged based on quasi-referenda, that is opinion polls. If the democratic nations of Europe and North America were ruled based on the fluctuating views of the general population, most countries would have the death penalty, some form of repatriation for many minorities and civil rights for homosexuals would be non-existent.

Political leaders have to make decisions which are not necessarily popular. Considering most leaders are voted in with less than 50% of the vote (remember, many people do not even vote), it is hardly surprising that opinion polls consistently show low approval ratings for leaders in most countries in the free world.

Kudos to Cheney for once again saying what he thinks and sticking to his principles. In the upcoming Presidential election, the man of principle and integrity who will not back down just to curry favour with the electorate is the man America needs right now. That man is, of course, John McCain. Obama merely wants to be popular and wants everyone around the world to like Americans; he will achieve the latter with regard to the extremists by leading America in retreat waving the white flag of surrender. In doing so, many of America’s Allies will lose respect for this great nation.

McCain will stand tall and steadfast. McCain’s America will be very unpopular with terrorists, anti-Americans, undemocratic rogue states, and all those who are willing to let America (or its Allies) be attacked again (ie the non-interventionists). These people will not like what McCain will do in the face of threats to America or its allies. So what?