Rosie’s Blog’s Damning Evidence.

Much of the furore surrounding the Rosie O’Donnell and Elisabeth Hasselbeck verbal entanglement centred on the notion that O’Donnell had described the US troops as terrorists. A charge that O’Donnell denies and one on which she forced Hasselbeck to defend her (eventually) during the now infamous row.

It is ironic that O’Donnell’s own blogsite contains the following quotation – a transcript of a discussion in which the ‘terrorist’ description pops up…

 “Dated: 2007-05-23
Did Rosie Call Our Troops Terrorists?

The [sic] is directly from the transcripts of The View for May 17th:

O’DONNELL: …… I just want to say something. 655,000 Iraqi civilians are dead. Who are the terrorists?
HASSELBECK: Who are the terrorists?
O’DONNELL: 655,000 Iraqis — I’m saying you have to look, we invaded –
HASSELBECK: Wait, who are you calling terrorists now? Americans?
O’DONNELL: I’m saying if you were in Iraq, and the other country, the United States, the richest in the world, invaded your country and killed 655,000 of your citizens, what would you call us?
HASSELBECK: Are we killing their citizens or are their people also killing their citizens?  
O’DONNELL: We’re invading a sovereign nation, occupying a country against the U.N.”

Notice, O’Donnell refuses to answer Hasselbeck’s questions regarding clarifying her position on the identity of the terrorists in her opinion. It is clear from her initial statement (my bold) that she is implying that US troops are the terrorists. She is clever enough not to actually put those words in the same sentence but her implication is crystal clear. Hasselbeck gave her ample opportunity to clarify her postion – O’Donnell refused.

It is typical of O’Donnell that she tosses in the 650,000 figure for the amount of Iraqis killed and she even has a section for this stat on her blogsite. I say typical, because of course the number 650,000 is not based on any facts. It is fictitious. There is no proof. This does not deter O’Donnell from using it as if it were true to back up her argument.

It is equally bizarre that she would state that the US was acting against the UN while conveniently ignoring the fact that Hussein/Iraq had been acting in violation of the UN for over a decade. I hardly think the current massacres occuring in Iraq as a result of the fighting between rival Muslim groups is in accordance with the UN charter either – although the lack of action from the UN regarding Darfur might suggest otherwise.

The fact that O’Donnell’s own blog contained the incriminating evidence – and yet, O’Donnell’s people viewing the transcript through Rosie-tinted spectacles do not see it. This might explain why they don’t ‘get’ 9/11 or the War on Terror.

Advertisements

2 Responses to “Rosie’s Blog’s Damning Evidence.”

  1. Victoria Morrill Says:

    I don’t believe Rosie was saying that the Americans are terriots but rather that we need to look at what the people of Iraq have gone through and may think? We go into the county and the results are, that thousands of innocent people have been killed, not to mention how many wounded there are. To them, we may look like terriorists. We keep getting told by this administration that that happens in war. However that is hard to swollow since it wasn’t Irag who boomed our towers? I just think Rosie was trying to make the point that we need to put ourselves in the shoes of the innocent Iragis and maybe that will help us to see the whole picture. I think we need to be compasionate for the people of Iraq and maybe it takes some big loud discussions that Rosie puts forth, for us to wake up! I never thought for a minute that Rosie was calling our troups terriost’s but trying to help Elizabeth see the other side because only than can we begin to heal this terrible situation we are in. Joy, I do commend you for your views and I believe you are a true peacemaker. I love the way you’ve have tried to keep the peace on the show. I am sad Rosie is leaving because I think you four are a good team.

  2. Brian Says:

    Rosie never called the troops “terrorists”. She has always supported the troops, which is why she is so adamant that the US brings them home as quickly as possible.

    Rosie was implying that the Bush Administration is responsible for 655,000 Iraqi deaths and that the Iraqis probably view us at terrorists.

    I don’t understand why thats so hard for people to grasp?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: